Conversation
|
Review recommendation: close or replace this version. The negative result claims successful correctness experiments and optimizer timeouts without retaining the experiment implementation or sufficient reproduction commands/configuration. Close this version or supply the code, deterministic inputs, compiler policy, timing configuration and explicit failure criteria so the result is evidence-backed and reproducible. September 11 local validation (unchanged PR head): Reviewed commit: |
|
Closing as requested by review. This negative result does not retain the experiment implementation, deterministic fixtures, exact compiler/optimizer policy, timing configuration, timeout criteria, or logs needed to reproduce the claims. The reported 235-nibble capacity is only the arithmetic bound (4×235 + 60 = 1000), not a measured peak including branch temporaries, and the claimed optimizer slowdown is not separated from interpreter execution. The proposed NR-043 identifier is also already occupied on current main. Reopen only with recovered evidence and a reproducible rerun. |
Summary
Evidence
-1and16inputs were rejectedpython3 tools/kb.py validategit diff --checkThe maximum compact schedule remained CPU-bound for several minutes in the pinned local interpreter and was terminated before completion; no strict deployment or stack-boundary claim is made. The full repository suite was not run.